<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real People &#124; Real Stories &#187; Simplify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog/tag/simplify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>nonfiction media's documentary production diary :: Nepal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Production Values vs. Simplicity: The Gearhead Conundrum</title>
		<link>http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog/2008/04/13/production-values-vs-simplicity-the-gearhead-conundrum/</link>
		<comments>http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog/2008/04/13/production-values-vs-simplicity-the-gearhead-conundrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>squire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gearhead Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production/Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video/Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These two priorities are on different, but intersecting paths. We need to find the intersection.  Simplicity: By this I mean the tools: The gear. The setups. The shots. The language. The editing. We feel drawn to simple storytelling. Plainspoken pictures. Simple editing. We want (and need, $$wise) to develop and use a simple kit of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two priorities are on different, but intersecting paths. We need to find the intersection. </p>
<p>Simplicity: By this I mean the tools: The gear. The setups. The shots. The language. The editing.</p>
<p>We feel drawn to simple storytelling. Plainspoken pictures. Simple editing. We want (and need, $$wise) to develop and use a simple kit of gear. Compact, versatile, quick to set up, and not so complex that we devote unneeded energy to working out how to actually use the stuff. </p>
<p>Production values: Okay, for argument&#8217;s sake, let&#8217;s make the assumption that we&#8217;re going to make something really good. If this is true then it&#8217;s in our interest to make sure it&#8217;s also refined enough that lots of people will be willing to look at it.</p>
<p>In other words, whatever we make needs to be well enough produced to communicate to folks who aren&#8217;t, you know, like <em>hungry for documentary</em> at any cost. Seems to me like lots of people will run away from soso looking/sounding stuff. </p>
<p>Our goal, then, is to sort the minimum configuration production equipment kit/workflow that will net us great looking stuff. Then learn to use it towards it potential.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the intersection. We have a lot of gear right now, the result of an ongoing quest to build<em> just the right</em> field kit, and I&#8217;m inclined to think we&#8217;d be well served to simplify.</p>
<p><a href="http://nonfictionphoto.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/img_02331.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-32" title="img_02331" src="http://nonfictionphoto.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/img_02331.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all ours, and also, it&#8217;s not all going with us. But an alarming amount of it is. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonfictionmedia.com/blog/2008/04/13/production-values-vs-simplicity-the-gearhead-conundrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

